Chicago Fire vs New England Revolution Bet Builder Tip
A research tool, not a bookmaker, we build the picks, you place them with your own bookie. We don't take bets. 18+
Our Model's Picks
Live bookie odds · verified record coming soonOur 2-Leg Bet Builder
78.8% chance all legs land · model probability on each rail
-
Chicago Fire or draw
≈1.11API-Football's own advice for this game is double chance, Chicago Fire or draw (90%). Double chance is our strongest verified market.
-
Over 2.5 Goals
≈1.14API-Football goals model: expected goals 2.50 + 2.50 → Over 2.5 Goals at 88%.
Built from the bookmakers' fair odds for Chicago Fire vs New England Revolution, 78.8% combined. Legs treated as independent, so treat this as a guide.
More to Build With
Extra markets · not trackedPlayer Form
Projected from club-season form, informational, not part of our verified record. Build your own bet.
-
P. Zinckernagel Chicago FireShots on Target 1+ 60%
P. Zinckernagel averages 0.84 SoT/match (19 apps), home vs opp conceding 4.5 SoT/game → lambda 0.93, P(1+)=60% P(2+)=24%
-
Carles Gil New England RevolutionShots on Target 1+ 54%
Carles Gil averages 0.86 SoT/match (21 apps), away vs opp conceding 4.5 SoT/game → lambda 0.77, P(1+)=54% P(2+)=18%
-
P. Miller New England RevolutionShots on Target 1+ 53%
P. Miller averages 0.84 SoT/match (19 apps), away vs opp conceding 4.5 SoT/game → lambda 0.76, P(1+)=53% P(2+)=18%
-
D. Turgeman New England RevolutionShots on Target 1+ 52%
D. Turgeman averages 0.81 SoT/match (21 apps), away vs opp conceding 4.5 SoT/game → lambda 0.73, P(1+)=52% P(2+)=17%
-
M. Haile-Selassie Chicago FireShots on Target 1+ 48%
M. Haile-Selassie averages 0.60 SoT/match (20 apps), home vs opp conceding 4.5 SoT/game → lambda 0.66, P(1+)=48% P(2+)=14%
-
J. Bamba Chicago FireShots on Target 1+ 48%
J. Bamba averages 0.60 SoT/match (15 apps), home vs opp conceding 4.5 SoT/game → lambda 0.66, P(1+)=48% P(2+)=14%
-
B. Raines New England RevolutionTo Be Carded 43%
B. Raines (Midfielder) on 0.47 yellows/match (19 apps), pos-mult 1.20 → lambda 0.57, P(carded)=43%
-
L. Langoni New England RevolutionShots on Target 1+ 42%
L. Langoni averages 0.60 SoT/match (15 apps), away vs opp conceding 4.5 SoT/game → lambda 0.54, P(1+)=42% P(2+)=10%
-
R. Lod Chicago FireShots on Target 1+ 41%
R. Lod averages 0.47 SoT/match (19 apps), home vs opp conceding 4.5 SoT/game → lambda 0.52, P(1+)=41% P(2+)=10%
Projections from club-season form only. We never record or grade player markets. They sit outside our verified record by design. 18+ · BeGambleAware.
Match Stats
Informational only, not part of our tracked record. These corner, card and foul projections come from each team's real season averages. Build your own bet.
- Over 9.5 Match Corners, 43% Corners: Chicago Fire avg 2.0 for/4.3 against, New England Revolution avg 6.1 for/5.9 against → expected 9.2 match corners
- Over 3.5 Match Cards, 55% Cards: Chicago Fire avg 2.7/game, New England Revolution avg 1.3/game → expected 3.9 match cards
- Over 20.5 Match Fouls, 41% Fouls: Chicago Fire avg 12.0/game, New England Revolution avg 7.6/game → expected 19.6 match fouls
- Over 24.5 Match Shots, 57% Shots: Chicago Fire avg 11.3/game, New England Revolution avg 14.2/game → expected 25.5 match shots
How is this built?
This bet builder is auto-generated by our football model across hundreds of weekly picks. Every leg is a team market (match result, goals, BTTS). Each leg shows the model's probability alongside the fair odds, so you can see exactly where we think the edge is. We don't cherry-pick wins; we log every prediction we publish, win or lose. Player markets shown above are informational only and never count toward that record. This is a league we don't have a proven record on yet, so these legs are the model's read on the bookies' odds, not yet part of our verified record.
View our full verified track record → | Full match preview →